At the dawn of its existence, during the First World War, anti-tank artillery was a conventional field guns used to fire at the first massive, unwieldy and poorly armored tanks. It soon became clear that the caliber of even the smallest regimental (75-mm or 76.2-mm) guns is excessive for such purposes. Reducing the caliber of the anti-tank gun led to several positive results at one time. Its weight decreased, which means that it was easier to move such a gun on the march and on the battlefield. Small-caliber shells were much lighter, which significantly increased the rate of fire.
A kind of flowering of miniature small-caliber anti-tank artillery systems occurred in the second half of the 30s — early 40s. At the beginning of the Second World War, when tanks with anti-shell armor had not yet become widespread in the armies of opposing states, inexpensive and easy-to-handle light anti-tank guns proved to be a formidable opponent for armored vehicles. On both sides of the front line, they were released in batches of thousands. But in the summer of 1941, when the German anti-tankers got acquainted with the Soviet T-34 and KV tanks, their 37-mm guns, which seemed reliable and effective yesterday, received from their owners the derogatory nickname 'door-knockers'.
The proposed photo review presents 15 typical samples of anti-tank artillery that were in service in different countries during the initial period of World War II. However, despite the fact that they were replaced by more powerful medium and heavy artillery anti-tank systems, many of them served until the end of the war, and some remained in service after its end.
In the captions to the photos, some tactical and technical characteristics are presented, when comparing which it should be remembered that the determination of armor penetration in different countries was calculated by different methods. Unless other is mentioned, the armor penetration indicator in the signature is given for firing a conventional caliber projectile from a distance of 500 meters at a right angle. However, even in this case, a direct comparison may still not be correct enough, since, for example, homogeneous armor could be used in some tests, and cemented in others.
If the background of the photos prevents you from reading the reference information for the photos, you can hover your mouse over the text. This will darken the text background.
At the dawn of its existence, during the First World War, anti-tank artillery was a conventional field guns used to fire at the first massive, unwieldy and poorly armored tanks. It soon became clear that the caliber of even the smallest regimental (75-mm or 76.2-mm) guns is excessive for such purposes. Reducing the caliber of the anti-tank gun led to several positive results at one time. Its weight decreased, which means that it was easier to move such a gun on the march and on the battlefield. Small-caliber shells were much lighter, which significantly increased the rate of fire.
A kind of flowering of miniature small-caliber anti-tank artillery systems occurred in the second half of the 30s — early 40s. At the beginning of the Second World War, when tanks with anti-shell armor had not yet become widespread in the armies of opposing states, inexpensive and easy-to-handle light anti-tank guns proved to be a formidable opponent for armored vehicles. On both sides of the front line, they were released in batches of thousands. But in the summer of 1941, when the German anti-tankers got acquainted with the Soviet T-34 and KV tanks, their 37-mm guns, which seemed reliable and effective yesterday, received from their owners the derogatory nickname 'door-knockers'.
The proposed photo review presents 15 typical samples of anti-tank artillery that were in service in different countries during the initial period of World War II. However, despite the fact that they were replaced by more powerful medium and heavy artillery anti-tank systems, many of them served until the end of the war, and some remained in service after its end.
In the captions to the photos, some tactical and technical characteristics are presented, when comparing which it should be remembered that the determination of armor penetration in different countries was calculated by different methods. Unless other is mentioned, the armor penetration indicator in the signature is given for firing a conventional caliber projectile from a distance of 500 meters at a right angle. However, even in this case, a direct comparison may still not be correct enough, since, for example, homogeneous armor could be used in some tests, and cemented in others.
If the background of the photos prevents you from reading the reference information for the photos, you can hover your mouse over the text. This will darken the text background.